Add to your order
-
Coverage for accidental damage including drops, spills, and broken parts, as well as breakdowns (plans vary) -
24/7 support when you need it. -
Quick, easy, and frustration-free claims.
Cover this product:
3-Year Protection $36.99
4 Year Kitchen Protection Plan $47.99
Select a plan
Add to your order
- Coverage for accidental damage including drops, spills, and broken parts, as well as breakdowns (plans vary)
- 24/7 support when you need it.
- Quick, easy, and frustration-free claims.
Cover this product:
Select a plan
Enjoy fast, free delivery, exclusive deals, and award-winning movies & TV shows with Prime
Try Prime
and start saving today with fast, free delivery
Frequently bought together
Similar items that may deliver to you quickly
Page 1 of 1 Start overPage 1 of 1
Product Description
Package List:
1 X Thermal Imaging Camera
1 X User Manual
1 X Lanyard
1 X USB Cable
1 X Drop Resistance Bag
- Provide a Protection bag for carrying and improving work efficiency.
HT-18
Most Affordable Hti-Series Thermal Camera
Featuring an impressive resolution, delivering crystal clear images to identify problematic areas, the HT-18 thermal imaging camera stands out with a lithium-ion battery which increases operation time and a larger screen to better view images.
The design and weight of the camera enables the user to comfortably hold and use the camera for an extended period of time. Large buttons for ease of use even with gloves on.
- ENHANCED IMAGE OVERLAY：A unique feature enabling the user to optimize the positioning of normal images with thermal images, creating a perfect fusion between the two.
Product Details
|
|
|
|
|
|---|---|---|---|
USB SlotUncover the soft tape and charge it with the USB cable. You can also connect the computer to transfer pictures. |
Sensor DesignThe ring-shaped in-line sensor design can effectively prevent the sensor from being damaged by collision. |
Screen ProtectorIn order to prevent screen scratches during transportation, we have specially made a screen protector that can be torn off when you receive the instrument. |
Protective CoverWhen not using the camera, cover the lens cover to prevent dust from entering, or other accidents to better protect the camera. |
Thermal Images
|
|
|
|
|
|---|---|---|---|
HVACCan be used to quickly find and inspect pipe leaks, as well as water pipes that are laid under the floor or plasterboard. The HT-18 can easily detect the true heat of the pipe radiated through the surface. |
MachineUsers can scan electric water heaters, electrical cabinets, components, and detect a large number of wires and connectors, and immediately understand the problem. The problem area can be detected and fixed before the problem actually occurs. |
ElectricElectrical faults are one of the most common faults in buildings. In most cases, these electrical problems are invisible to the naked eye, but the use of HT-18 can immediately see hot spots on images. |
Geothermal pipeHT-18 is inspection tools that can be used to quickly find and inspect pipe leaks, as well as water pipes that are laid under the floor or plasterboard. HT-18 can easily detect the true heat of the pipe that radiates through the surface. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| HT-18 | HT-19 | HT-19 | HT-18+ | HT-H8 | HT-301 | |
|
|
|
|||||
| Customer Reviews |
777
|
208
|
568
|
150
|
64
|
159
|
| Price | $288.86 | — | — | $255.88 | $969.99 | $755.86 |
| Display screen | 3.2 ″ full angle TFT display screen | 3.2 ″ full angle TFT display screen | 3.2 ″ full angle TFT display screen | 3.2 ″ full angle TFT | 3.2 ″ full angle TFT | According to your adroid phone |
| Infrared image resolution | 220×160 | 320×240 | 320×240 | 256x192 | 384x288 | 384x288 |
| Field angle/shortest focus length | 56°x 42°/ 0.15m | 35°x26°/0.15mm | 56°x 42°/ 0.15m | 56°×42°/3.2mm | 28.4°×21.4° | 28.4°×21.4° |
| Emissivity | Adjustable from 0.01 to 1.0 | Adjustable from 0.01 to 1.0 | Adjustable from 0.01 to 1.0 | Adjustable from 0.01 to 1.0 | Adjustable from 0.01 to 1.0 | Adjustable from 0.01 to 1.0 |
| Frame rate of thermal images | 9Hz | 9Hz | 9Hz | 25Hz | 25Hz | 25Hz |
| Wavelength coverage | 8-14um | 8-14um | 8-14um | 8-14um | 8 – 14μm | 8 – 14μm |
| Storage medium | Built-in 3G (above 20 thousand image stored) | Built-in 3G (above 20 thousand image stored) | Built-in 3G (above 20 thousand image stored) | Built-in 3G (above 20 thousand image stored) | Built-in 8G | According to your adroid phone |
| Temperature measurement accuracy | ±2°C or ±2% | ±2°C or ±2% | ±2°C or ±2% | ±2°C or ±2% | ±2°C or ±2% | ±2°C or ±2% |
| Temperature range | -20℃~300℃(-4℉~572℉ | -20℃~300℃(-4℉~572℉ | -20℃~300℃(-4℉~572℉ | -20℃ to 550℃ (-4°F to 1022°F) | -20℃ to 550℃ (-4°F to 1022°F) | -20℃ to 550℃ (-4°F to 1022°F) |
| Focus mode | Auto focus | Auto focus | Auto focus | Auto focus | Manual focus | Manual focus |
Videos
Page 1 of 1Start OverPage 1 of 1
Videos for this product
0:34
Click to play video
Customer Review: The camera is amazing, but not the star of the show!
LT
Videos for this product
13:36
Click to play video
How to set the setting of ht-18 thermal camera
mellissa
Videos for this product
0:59
Click to play video
Hti-H18 Thermal camera
XT Instrument
Reviews with images
Flir One 3 vs Flir One Pro vs HTI HT-18
Take a look at the pictures. Flir does connect real image to thermal image and it does if fact seem to produce nice images… until both images don’t align properly. I used the calibration option, but if I changed angle, image was not aligned again. Flir Pro has two temperature range settings, higher range was used only for the fireplace.In terms of image quality – HT-18 has highest thermal resolution sensor (220x160), then Flir Pro (160x120), and lastly Flir One (80x60). The way Flir fools you is that it takes photo in 1440x1080 resolution and then overlays the thermal image over it. HT-18 saves 240x320 pixel images so I needed to enlarge them for the comparison. I really like extra “heat” details that HT captures, as Flir seems to blur images too much (due to lower resolution thermal sensors), but HT-18 has smaller field of vision.In terms of accuracy – it’s hard to tell since I have those three devices and IR thermometer. For the comparison of 3d printer bed – printer was set up to heat to 80C. Seems like HT aligns with whatever IR thermometer is telling better than Flirs.Couple points:Flir – little space, photos directly on the phone so easy to share, need to be charged separately from the phone, One is software limited to one measurement spot, Flir watermark on all photos.HT-18 – higher refresh rate and less “calibrating” pauses, feels more secure in hand and less like a toy, 18650 battery meaning it can be more or less easy replaced, my PC refuses to connect to HT-18 if connected to USB 3 ports, USB 2 works fine, my laptop doesn’t care, my phone with usb-c to USB 3 adapter works fine.If your budget is <$200 you can’t go wrong with Flir One, but if it’s <$500 then HT-18 seems to win. Overall, I will keep HT-18 and hopefully it will last me a long time.
Top reviews from the United States
There was a problem filtering reviews right now. Please try again later.
Reviewed in the United States on January 31, 2021
Take a look at the pictures. Flir does connect real image to thermal image and it does if fact seem to produce nice images… until both images don’t align properly. I used the calibration option, but if I changed angle, image was not aligned again. Flir Pro has two temperature range settings, higher range was used only for the fireplace.
In terms of image quality – HT-18 has highest thermal resolution sensor (220x160), then Flir Pro (160x120), and lastly Flir One (80x60). The way Flir fools you is that it takes photo in 1440x1080 resolution and then overlays the thermal image over it. HT-18 saves 240x320 pixel images so I needed to enlarge them for the comparison. I really like extra “heat” details that HT captures, as Flir seems to blur images too much (due to lower resolution thermal sensors), but HT-18 has smaller field of vision.
In terms of accuracy – it’s hard to tell since I have those three devices and IR thermometer. For the comparison of 3d printer bed – printer was set up to heat to 80C. Seems like HT aligns with whatever IR thermometer is telling better than Flirs.
Couple points:
Flir – little space, photos directly on the phone so easy to share, need to be charged separately from the phone, One is software limited to one measurement spot, Flir watermark on all photos.
HT-18 – higher refresh rate and less “calibrating” pauses, feels more secure in hand and less like a toy, 18650 battery meaning it can be more or less easy replaced, my PC refuses to connect to HT-18 if connected to USB 3 ports, USB 2 works fine, my laptop doesn’t care, my phone with usb-c to USB 3 adapter works fine.
If your budget is <$200 you can’t go wrong with Flir One, but if it’s <$500 then HT-18 seems to win. Overall, I will keep HT-18 and hopefully it will last me a long time.
In terms of image quality – HT-18 has highest thermal resolution sensor (220x160), then Flir Pro (160x120), and lastly Flir One (80x60). The way Flir fools you is that it takes photo in 1440x1080 resolution and then overlays the thermal image over it. HT-18 saves 240x320 pixel images so I needed to enlarge them for the comparison. I really like extra “heat” details that HT captures, as Flir seems to blur images too much (due to lower resolution thermal sensors), but HT-18 has smaller field of vision.
In terms of accuracy – it’s hard to tell since I have those three devices and IR thermometer. For the comparison of 3d printer bed – printer was set up to heat to 80C. Seems like HT aligns with whatever IR thermometer is telling better than Flirs.
Couple points:
Flir – little space, photos directly on the phone so easy to share, need to be charged separately from the phone, One is software limited to one measurement spot, Flir watermark on all photos.
HT-18 – higher refresh rate and less “calibrating” pauses, feels more secure in hand and less like a toy, 18650 battery meaning it can be more or less easy replaced, my PC refuses to connect to HT-18 if connected to USB 3 ports, USB 2 works fine, my laptop doesn’t care, my phone with usb-c to USB 3 adapter works fine.
If your budget is <$200 you can’t go wrong with Flir One, but if it’s <$500 then HT-18 seems to win. Overall, I will keep HT-18 and hopefully it will last me a long time.
Images in this review
Reviewed in the United States on April 9, 2021
Reviewed in the United States on January 20, 2019
The comparison and tests were made between Flir TG165 and this HT-18
Pros:
- sensor quality, way more details than TG165. As you can see in the picture, more areas are marked in red for HT-18 instead just the facial area for TG165. The automatic high/low temperature point tracking is very useful and reliable feature
- $409 retail price is another big advantage at these specs.
Cons(not really Cons, more like something can be improved:
- Too bulky. According to the tear down from the fellow from EEVBlog, an A33 modular logic/CPU board is used on the top of the customized PCB, which make the overall dimension larger, since good amount of body volume was used for enhance the rigidity. I understand this is the trade off your engineers made to expedite the developing process and reduce the risk. I hope you guys will get better understanding of the Chipset and have them fully integrated to your own PCB.
- clicking sound(perhaps from the lens shutter?) is kinda annoying. It is claimed to working at 8Hz display rate but it is clearly not as smooth as what behaved on TG165 although it displays at 9Hz rate.
- booting time is significantly slower than TG165
- battery isn't that long consider its size. It lasted less longer than TG165, I understand there are more information to process. Please consider to use 3000 mah 18650 battery instead of 2000mah.
- firmware needs to be polished.
- another big disadvantage is the viewing angle, which is kinda narrow for me, compare the 50 degree for TG165 and 45 degree for flir E4. I have to keep the camera slightly further away from my PCB in order to have a good coverage.
- Since the camera has both IR camera and regular camera, 2 image will only align well when the object is far enough. Compare to Flir E4-E8, who had their 2 cameras really close to each other, the HT-18 has its regular camera placed on top of the IR camera with farther distance. If HTI is willing to make some upgrade its lens module to reduce the distance in between 2 cameras while providing viewing angle to 40-45 degrees, it can be the Flir E4 upgrade option killer market killer :D
Overall, I am happy with this product, and can’t go back to TG165 anymore.
Pros:
- sensor quality, way more details than TG165. As you can see in the picture, more areas are marked in red for HT-18 instead just the facial area for TG165. The automatic high/low temperature point tracking is very useful and reliable feature
- $409 retail price is another big advantage at these specs.
Cons(not really Cons, more like something can be improved:
- Too bulky. According to the tear down from the fellow from EEVBlog, an A33 modular logic/CPU board is used on the top of the customized PCB, which make the overall dimension larger, since good amount of body volume was used for enhance the rigidity. I understand this is the trade off your engineers made to expedite the developing process and reduce the risk. I hope you guys will get better understanding of the Chipset and have them fully integrated to your own PCB.
- clicking sound(perhaps from the lens shutter?) is kinda annoying. It is claimed to working at 8Hz display rate but it is clearly not as smooth as what behaved on TG165 although it displays at 9Hz rate.
- booting time is significantly slower than TG165
- battery isn't that long consider its size. It lasted less longer than TG165, I understand there are more information to process. Please consider to use 3000 mah 18650 battery instead of 2000mah.
- firmware needs to be polished.
- another big disadvantage is the viewing angle, which is kinda narrow for me, compare the 50 degree for TG165 and 45 degree for flir E4. I have to keep the camera slightly further away from my PCB in order to have a good coverage.
- Since the camera has both IR camera and regular camera, 2 image will only align well when the object is far enough. Compare to Flir E4-E8, who had their 2 cameras really close to each other, the HT-18 has its regular camera placed on top of the IR camera with farther distance. If HTI is willing to make some upgrade its lens module to reduce the distance in between 2 cameras while providing viewing angle to 40-45 degrees, it can be the Flir E4 upgrade option killer market killer :D
Overall, I am happy with this product, and can’t go back to TG165 anymore.
Images in this review
Top reviews from other countries
Redeagle1
Gutes Produkt für den Preis
Reviewed in Germany on July 18, 2023
Redeagle1
Reviewed in Germany on July 18, 2023
Einerseits für die Auswahl von Deckenlampen sowie für deren Montage.
Hat wunderbar funktioniert. Besser knapp 400 Euro hierfür ausgeben als die Reparaturkosten für missglückten Bohrungen.
Verglichen mit teureren Geräten hat diese Kamera eine geringere Auflösung. Für Anwendungen im privaten Gebrauch reicht sie allemal.
Würde sie wieder kaufen.
Images in this review
SDO Technologies
Very impressed by this product
Reviewed in Canada on March 7, 2021
SDO Technologies
Reviewed in Canada on March 7, 2021
Images in this review
Antonyode
Appareil performant, excellent rapport qualité/prix. Capteurs Thermique + visuel
Reviewed in France on December 17, 2020